Why Nuclear Weapons Are Not ‘Immoral’

Although I have talked about the problem with ‘moral arguments’ in a previous post1, I have recently heard many people say nuclear weapons are immoral and therefore think it would be useful to explore this issue further on this subject.

One of the arguments for nuclear weapons is that they have kept the peace since the second world war, and the deterrent effect has stopped a major confrontation between the ‘superpowers’ that could result in millions of dead.

This is a moral and principled argument which cannot be easily dismissed. There are many well-meaning and knowledgeable people adhere to it. I would not argue that people who think this are immoral, evil warmongers – they are just wrong.

Although not the subject of this post, just to point out some counterarguments to their arguments are:

  • there were (and are) many proxy wars between the competing blocks during this time of peace.
  • the NATO countries followed a policy of containment with the Soviet Union. However, since the mid the collapse of the Soviet Union NATO has followed a policy of expansion . George Kennan, who is often called the “Father of Containment”2 called a fateful error3.
  • even if the deterrent effect is valid, it does not rule out the possibility of accidental nuclear4 war or irrational actors
  • rational actors could make decisions that lead to nuclear exchange. As Robert McNamara (who was Secretary of State during the Cuban Missile Crisis) stated:

“Rational individuals: Kennedy was rational; Khrushchev was rational; Castro was rational. Rational individuals came that close to total destruction of their societies. And that danger exists today.5

Morals Are Important

Having an idea what is good and bad conduct within a society is a vital part of a functioning society and individuals within that society. However, this does not mean that such conduct is inherently ‘good’ or ‘bad’. For example, homosexuality, a gentile going out with a Jew, black people using the same entrance as a white person, have been seen as immoral.

While we cannot deny that morals exist within a society, it does mean that they are right.

Show Them They Are Wrong – Not Bad

As I have previously argued1,6, there is a danger of using your political opinions as a personal profile, and it is important to see politics as a problem of how we organize society rather than a way of virtue signalling.

Saying that a person is immoral and a bad person does not engender meaningful debate or get people to change their opinion.

Reasoned argument about why we think they are wrong can.


  1. Virtue Signalling โ€“ Here Be Dragons; Peter Lux (https://www.plux.co.uk/virtue-signalling-here-be-dragons/) โ†ฉ๏ธŽ
  2. George F. Kennan; Wikipedia (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/George_F._Kennan) โ†ฉ๏ธŽ
  3. A Fateful Error; George F. Kennan; New York Times; 5 February 1997 (https://www.nytimes.com/1997/02/05/opinion/a-fateful-error.html) โ†ฉ๏ธŽ
  4. Accidental Nuclear War; Lakenheath Alliance for Peace (https://lakenheathallianceforpeace.org.uk/accidental-nuclear-war/) โ†ฉ๏ธŽ
  5. The Fog Of War (film); Robert McNamara; transcript of the film can be found at (https://alphahistory.com/coldwar/robert-mcnamara-reflects-cuban-missile-crisis-2003/) โ†ฉ๏ธŽ
  6. Why I Donโ€™t Wear Badges; Peter Lux (https://www.plux.co.uk/why-i-dont-wear-badges/) โ†ฉ๏ธŽ
Share

Categories:

,

Tags:


Comments

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Captcha: * Time limit is exhausted. Please reload CAPTCHA.

Recent Posts


Old Posts


Categories